I don't do Windows so my knowledge there is limited.)Īs for settings, aside from configuring the client to use parallel and multi-part transfers, there's not much you can do with settings that will impact performance.
Filezilla does not have this capability, but CuteFTP and Bitkinex (and lftp on Linux) do. But that are network configurations, where WinSCP does not perform that well, but it's hard for us to solve that obviously. We have optimized WinSCP for networks configuration we have available. This latter capability might help a lot with that single 4k movie. FileZilla is not faster than WinSCP in general.
Some clients can do multiple files in parallel and also break individual files into pieces that are transferred in parallel.
Filezilla vs winscp reddit movie#
If you're trying to download a single 4k movie file, that multiple file capability isn't going to help you. Filezilla can transfer multiple files in parallel, allowing you better speed in some congested situations, but only when you have multiple files to transfer. That said, in some situations the capabilities brought to the table by some FTP clients will allow them to perform better in certain situations than will other clients. The fact that somebody elsewhere in the world can get their Ferrari up to 180 MPH isn't relevant when you're stuck in bumper-to-bumper traffic on the 405. Unless otherwise specified in footnotes, comparisons are based on the stable versions without any add-ons, extensions, or external programs. FTP/SFTP speeds will, in general, depend almost entirely on the path between source and destination and the amount of overall traffic along that path. The following tables compare general and technical information for a number of File Transfer Protocol (FTP) clients. The fact that one person gets great speeds with ProgramX does not mean everyone will get great speeds with ProgramX.
0 kommentar(er)
